THE KING OF ALL CONS
PART ONE
By Pastor Dick Carmack
Standing mightily astride the high rises of New York, The
Gigantic Donald smites all armies thrown at him, intercepting aircraft and
bullets in flight, swatting down missiles, all the while clutching at with one
arm the prize of all prizes, the Presidency of the
United States.
He is untouchable. He is the hero of the day. All hail the
Donald!
THE
KING OF ALL CONS MAY BE WELL UNDERWAY!
Desperation
is in the air. America is sliding toward chaos and people can see and feel it
though they may not put it into words. Grasping at straws, a man arises who
claims to be able to reverse the descent and as a result, a full third, soon to
be probably more than half of all Americans are willing to support him for the
Presidency. Is he for real or is it a con?
__________
It may well be a plot hatched in
hell and America’s conservatives are ingesting it hook, line and sinker.
Americans hate our present government with a passion. Donald Trump has tapped
into that anger and is sweeping the GOP race for the nomination and apparently
the presidency of the Republic. The whole show however may well be a Broadway
production, staged by that shadowy group known as “Illuminati.”
J.R. Church writes in his
astounding and extensively documented book, “Guardians of the Grail,”
“This book reveals the sordid story of a secret
organization based in Europe, which, down through the centuries, has been the
guardian of a so-called “holy bloodline.” Participants in this clandestine
group believe that members of this “sacred lineage” are descended from Mary
Magdalene and Jesus Christ. Their ultimate goal is world government!”[1]
Donald
Trump (as documented later) reportedly carries in his veins “royal blood,” that
supposedly qualifies him for membership in the “sacred lineage.”
__________
Church gives us the history of
this diabolic movement which students of rotten governance know sometimes as
“The New World Order” that began in the Garden of Eden when Satan tempted Eve
with the lure of “ye shall be as gods.” That attempt was a roaring success for
the arch-enemy of God and since that day the love of power (and the money
required to get it) has dominated the darker side of all unsaved humans.
The next big move was the
erection of the Tower of Babel in the first recorded attempt at world
government. That one had a great beginning but ended in failure when God
descended from heaven and scattered them from “thence upon the face of all the
earth.” Satan licked his wounds and retreated, waiting for a better day.
For the next three thousand
years scores of world dictator “wanna be(s)” came and went but nothing really
stuck until the “Crusaders” struck it rich when they apparently found the
fabled “Solomon’s Treasure” while digging in and around the Jewish Temple on
Mount Moriah in Jerusalem.
The first Crusade, called “The
people’s Crusade” began in 1096 and lasted for three years. The ninth, and last
Crusade was led by Prince Edward, (later Edward 1 of England) ran for less than
2 years and ended in 1272. Sometime during that 176 year period the money power
of the world had its big beginning. Called “pilgrims,” an early order of
Knights Templar in 1119 was granted a headquarters in a wing of the royal
palace on the Temple Mount in the captured Al-Aqsa Mosque, below which was
believed to be the ruins of the Temple of Solomon.[2]
Digging therein the Knights supposedly found the bulk of Solomon’s Treasure,
which had been derived in part from his celebrated “mines.”
The story goes that when the
treasure was recovered it was clandestinely spirited off to Scotland, there to
form the financial foundation of the banking systems of the world, and to
finance skullduggery, partly through banking, in almost every facet of activity
on the globe where money was to be made. Added onto the ultimate crime syndicate,
is the proposition that because of the possession of big money you also receive
the right to rule the masses. They call it “the divine right of kings.”
That is a bare outline of the
empires of which our esteemed Donald Trump we discover is apparently part of
when you do some digging. Mr. Trump is perhaps a tool of the empires
that control the earth which we sometimes know as New World Order Globalists.
Does the foregoing perhaps explain the reported “million dollar loan” to Donald
by his father, or perhaps is there financing that extends much deeper into
global pockets? Think Mark Zuckerberg and his alleged multi-million dollar seed
loan from either the CIA or his grandfather to start Facebook, which is the
greatest intelligence gathering apparatus ever invented.
As stated above Americans are
fed up to the point of vomit with the present political leaders and their
obvious manipulations (in both parties) sucking us closer and closer into the
abyss that will eventually enslave us all unless it is somehow halted. That
realization accounts for the apparently “unexplainable” support for Trump.
Question; If there is indeed a
group of diabolic men who are so fabulously wealthy that they can start and
stop a war with a snap of their fingers, a group that by definition has to be
brilliant in their deliberations, how could they possibly overlook a boiling
rebellion that threatens civil war in America and fail to attempt to stop it?
It’s well known the FBI has infiltrated hundreds of organizations from the
right to the left and have therefore allegedly been able to stop terrorist
attacks before they ever start. And yet, we are led to believe by the
controlled media the “Trump Phenomena” is apparently “unstoppable” being fueled
by a “deep anger and resentment on the part of the people.”
Hogwash! If the conspirators
(and they do indeed exist) are able to topple governments and to control world
wars they are also able to stop “The Donald.”
This writer fears we are being
conned into the “King of all Cons.” A centuries old organization that controls
literally trillions of dollars and owns (or has a mortgage on) most of the
world is not about to be dethroned by an upstart real estate developer from New
York. What then is the secret agenda propelling the Trump? Simply stated it may
be part of a diabolical plan to rule the world with a fist of iron. Part Two of
this article will deal with some disturbing parallels between the rise of Trump
and the rise of Hitler that devastated Europe and came pretty close to
conquering the world.
First we will look at the Trump
connection to the supposed “Blue Bloods” of the world that claim the “Divine
Right of Kings” to rule the world.
According to an article in
Infowars dated January 21, 2009[3]
which in turn quotes the New York Post[4]
“According to a New York Post article entitled “Cousins by Dozens: Fruitful
Search Through Family Trees” written by Ginger Adams Otis on October 28, 2007,
Barack Obama is George W. Bush’s 11th cousin enjoying a closer relationship
than former Vice-President Dick Cheney who is George W. Bush’s 9th cousin once
removed, while Barack Obama is Dick Cheney’s 8th Cousin.” And, strange as it
may seem, Donald Trump also belongs to the “blue-blooded” family of the super
rich and super endowed who are destined to rule the world!
The same article states:
“According to Rosemary E. Bachelor, a Pulitzer Prize-winning
journalist, historian and genealogical publisher, Obama is related
to “at least eight American presidents (sharing) common
ancestors, (with) 1. James Madison [Edwin and Martha
(Eltonhead) Conway], 2. Woodrow Wilson [Edward and Elizabeth
(Blossom) FitzRandolph], 3. Harry Truman [Mareen Duvall], 4)
Gerald Ford [Joseph and Rose (Allen) Holley], 5. Lyndon
Johnson [Phillip and Maria (Schmidt) Ament], 6. Jimmy Carter [Adrian
and Mary (Disharoone) Gordy], 7. George Bush Sr. and 8.
George Bush Jr. [Gov. Thomas and Mary (Richards) Hinckley].” (emphasis
in original) An illustration accompanying the article follows:
“Both Hillary and Donald
share common ancestors[5]
tracing their lineage back to England.
“Both Clinton and
Trump claim lineage to John of Gaunt, the 14th century 1st Duke of Lancaster
and son of England’s King Edward III, John of Gaunt, a royal in the 14th
century, was the son of King Edward III and featured in the Shakespearean play
Richard II, named after his nephew. Both the real estate tycoon and former Secretary of State are the direct
descendants of 14th century 1st Duke of Lancaster, John of Gaunt and his third
wife Katherine Swynford, according to the ancestry site MyHeritage.com. Clinton
claims the lineage to her 18th great-grandparents through the Rodham family of
her father’s side while Trump is related to her through his mother Mary Anne
Macleod, who was born in Scotland.
“The common relative
means that the Democrat and Republican are 19th cousins.
Ancestry site
MyHeritage has discovered that the Democratic and Republican
front-runners in the
race for the White House are actually distantly related through
a royal British
ancestor. The site has revealed that Trump and Clinton are actually 19th
cousins and share the same 18th great-grandparents. Ancestry site MyHeritage
has discovered that the Democratic and Republican front-runners in the race for
the White House, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are distantly related through
a royal ancestor (named) Swynford
(who) was at first Gaunt’s mistress, but they later married and their offspring
were legitimized.
“Gaunt’s children by
Swynford include Trump’s 17th great-grandfather John Beaufort
and Clinton’s 17th great-grandmother Joan Beaufort, according to MyHeritage.
The Duke of Lancaster’s son by his first wife Blanche, would later go on to
become Henry IV. Various other descendants of Gaunt would claim his lineage to
Edward III during the War of the Roses, a conflict that makes today’s political
scandals seem laughably tame in comparison. The war ultimately ended when Henry
VII, a member of the House of Lancaster, defeated Richard III in battle and
became the first Tudor king.”[6]
The same article even has Sarah Palin sharing the royal hemoglobin along
with Joseph Smith founder of the Mormon religion, and don’t forget slippery
Bill Clinton.
Meanwhile the elite of the world “wring their hands and sweat profusely”
at the prospect of the Trump possibly gaining the presidency. According to a
recent article by Reuters we read,
"’Unbelievable",
"embarrassing’ even "dangerous" are some of the words the
financial elite gathered at the World Economic Forum conference in the Swiss
resort of Davos have been using to describe U.S. Republican presidential frontrunner
Donald Trump.”[7]
Give me a break! If it were
really that serious, if the elite were actually and honestly worried about
Trump becoming President an “accident” could be easily arranged or perhaps an
unexpected heart attack. It’s been done before.
The recent death of Justice
Antonin Scalia, found on a secluded ranch with “a pillow over his head,” was a
clear message he was a “blood sacrifice” to Satan and had been murdered with
the result that others that had plans of opposing the Globalist agenda had
better walk carefully and watch their backs.
It was reported by the media
that during the 2004 election cycle with both George Bush Jr. and John Kerry
sharing royal blood, Burke’s Peerage gave slight odds in favor of Kerry because
he had “a little more royal blood than Bush.” If researched, odds are that Al
Gore, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and other political leaders will also be found
to be members of that most exclusive club.
You don’t get the top job
running the company store unless you are part of the family that owns it. This
all goes back to the idea those that rule, are above the rest of us, claiming
immunity from criticism or challenge.
“The divine right of kings
or divine right is a political and religious
doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch is
subject to no earthly authority, deriving the right to rule directly from the
will of God. The king
is thus not subject to the will of his people, the aristocracy,
or any other estate of the realm, including (in the view of
some, especially in Protestant countries or during the reign of Henry VIII of
England) the Catholic Church. It is often expressed in the phrase "by the Grace of God," attached to the
titles of a reigning monarch.”[8]
We hear a little, but just a
little, about some of Trump’s early days and some of his early positions like
being pro-abortion and giving big bucks to Hillary and Bill (see below).
Many staunch conservatives today
look back at some of their liberal positions when they were young, but later
became solid in what they are today. But in addition to youthful lapses in
judgment, Trump has done some very strange things lately and is still taking
strange positions if he truly is the answer to the people’s prayers. Consider
for example this report by Dave Hodges:
“Hillary
Clinton attended Donald Trump’s 2005 wedding to
current wife in Florida. Hillary Clinton had front-pew
seating at the event. Even Bill Clinton, not a person known for respecting the
sanctity of marriage, showed up for the reception.
“Trump has been generous in towards the Clinton’s in the
past as he has donated
over $100,000 to the Clinton’s foundation. And as a former Senator
from New York, Hillary Clinton has responded
in kind as she left many of the Trump real estate deals alone when
she could have a negative impact.[9]
As Mr. Trump bulls his way into
the GOP nomination notwithstanding all of the “noise” being made by the
establishment, count me out as being in attendance to either his cheering
section or coronation.
Isn’t it strange the media gives
almost constant coverage to the antics of Donald while explaining they actually
“deplore his tactics?” Why don’t they just freeze him out of the publicity
limelight? They did that with Rand Paul as they did to dad Ron Paul and are
past masters in shunning and blanking out anyone they don’t like. No, the
captive media has apparently been given their orders: “Give Trump all the
publicity you can while posing to be against him.” One is reminded of Randolph
Hearst who gave orders to his editors, “Puff (Billy) Graham” an evangelical
that had no problem with sending saved sinners right back into the arms of the
Roman Catholic church that seems to be slated as the False Prophet of
Revelation.
Part two of this article will
examine some of the creepy parallels between Donald Trump and the little
Corporal, Adolph Hitler. We will also
look at how the “divine right of kings” was established and legitimized in the
public venue.
__________
THE KING OF ALL CONS
PART TWO
First an explanation of the origins of “The Divine Right of Kings.”
After centuries of bad governance there arose several rebellions against
the people that had gained, and wanted to hold onto their power. In England
members of Parliament has set their eyes on even more power and rebellion was
detected by the existing, real rulers. Something needed to be done.
How about a teaching, ostensibly from God Himself that would put down
any ideas of rebellion and overthrowal of the “powers that be?”
“The theory of the Divine Right of Kings aimed at instilling
obedience by explaining why all social
ranks were religiously and morally obliged to obey their government.
“The religious fervor awakened by the Reformation and
Counter-Reformation provoked rebellion all over Europe. In England, both Roman
Catholic and Puritan theorists justified disobedience, and even forcible
resistance, to heretical governments that attacked the true religion.
“An increasingly high proportion of MPs had been educated at Oxford or
Cambridge (England’s two universities) and/or at the Inns of Court (where
lawyers were taught their profession).
“The theory of the Divine Right of Kings was directed at convincing this
literate and wealthy group that they should serve as royal officials, not try
and seize power for themselves.[10]
To summarize the above quote (which researchers like J.R. Church
disagree with vehemently), let’s just say it is a theory concocted by the kings
to keep the peasants in line by telling them the Bible taught them to do so.
The modern tactic to keep the cattle in the corral is to quote Romans 13:1-7.
That passage appears to teach voluntary subjection to whomever or whatever happens
to be in charge. The teachers conveniently overlook however, Verse 4a that
explicitly teaches the ruler must be “for good.” It follows therefore if the
ruler is bad, the teaching is automatically nullified.
According to Church, the explanation given above is the sanitized
version while he and others say the REAL belief of the “Blue Bloods” is that
kings (and their descendents) have “royal blood,” derived from a supposed union
between Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ. That supposedly devolved into a European
sect called the Merovingians from which sprang the Habsburgs and other self
annointed royalty.
In addition to Part One of this article that shows the alleged
connection between Mr. Trump and his supposed “Divinely Charged” forefathers,
there are even more reasons to be very suspicious of the meteoric rise of the
current front-runner for the Republican nomination for President (Feb 23,
2016). This writer hopes his fears are ungrounded and that Mr. Trump is
actually whom he says he is. However, knowing something about the sin nature of
all men and their almost insatiable quest for money and power we feel there are
many warning signs that need to be examined.
There are disturbing similarities between Donald Trump and an earlier
strong man the world knows as Adolph Hitler. It appears to this writer (and
there is a lot of convincing evidence) that the rise of Hitler was only made
possible by an infusion of money by the industrialists in both Germany but
primarily in the United States. Donald Trump has taken bankruptcy four
different times and still has reportedly amassed a fortune of $8-9 billion. Has
someone infused money into his coffers in order keep them well supplied so he
can claim to be “financing his own campaign?”
In the financing of Hitler’s rise to power, the Bush family in the
person of Grandpapa Prescott Bush was involved.[11]
In addition the Bank of England and the American Federal Reserve put money into
his rise to power.[12]
A blockbuster book by Anthony Sutton also gives great detail of the clandestine
activities of Wall Street in the financing and subsequent rise to power of
Adolph Hitler.[13]
The question now becomes, does Wall Street still have its hand in the
controlling of political picking of Presidents, or have they taken a vow of
celibacy? We would be very naïve to believe that those involved in the
never-ending quest for money and power have decided to sit this one out. Have
the movers and shakers of world suddenly decided to become bystanders and to
actually let the people elect a man who on the surface seems determined to
topple the financial rulers of the world?
Let’s look at a few of the tell-tale-tags of where we are today.
TRUMP WANTS TO REPLACE OBAMACARE WITH SOMETHING BETTER AND CHEAPER
“Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924)
stated: "Socialized medicine is a keystone to the establishment of a
socialist state."[14]
Here is Adolph with his version of “Hitlercare.”
”The National Socialist Workers' Party leader, Adolph Hitler, became Chancellor of Germany on January 30, 1933, and began implementing a plan of universal healthcare, with no regard for conscience.”[15]
What about Trump’s views on healthcare? Here is a quote from an article
about his views:
“He has broken with many
Republicans on taxing the rich, threatening trade wars and keeping Planned
Parenthood alive. On Friday, Donald
J. Trump faced criticism for an even bolder act of conservative heresy:
embracing the core tenet of the Affordable Care Act.”[16]
“Less than 24 hours later, Mr.
Trump backed away from his remarks, proclaiming himself to be the fiercest
opponent of the health law. It was the latest example of a candidate who has
been impervious to inconsistencies again emerging unscathed from a misstep that
would probably be damaging to anyone else.”[17]
We note that Mr. Trump
consistently reminds us that he is “not a politician” but flip-flops such as
the preceding seems to contradict his statements. Flip-flops according to the
prevailing political winds is a tell-tale sign of a professional politician.
THE RIGHT TO LIFE
Hitler’s complete contempt for
human life is beyond dispute, killing babies, the infirm, mentally and
physically handicapped (Veterans and others) in addition to six million Jews,
not to mention political opponents is well documented. But what about Trump’s
view of the sanctity of life?
“January
25, 2016 (LiveActionNews) -- On the
43rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, many GOP presidential contenders
were not silent. While Democrats Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton continue to
defend the horrors of abortion, Republicans Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush,
Rick Santorum, Carly Fiorina, and Ben Carson took to social media. Recognizing
the tragedy of over 58 million lives lost, these candidates explained why they
stand for life.“Donald Trump, however, was silent on abortion, the March for Life, and Roe v. Wade all day. He was the only GOP front runner to avoid making a statement. Issues concerning Trump’s pro-abortion past continue to rise – including his statement that his sister would be “one of the best” justices for the U.S. Supreme Court, despite her ruling in favor of partial-birth abortion as a circuit judge.”[18]
It seems Trump has a problem in coming straight out and endorsing the Pro-Life position. That in itself is not conclusive, but it certainly raises red flags. He also has major problems in cutting off funding for Planned Parenthood even though he is well aware of the videos showing the butchering of aborted babies so their parts could be sold for profit.
“This past week, for the first time, Trump has specifically promised he would sign a bill as president to de-fund Planned Parenthood. Trump has repeatedly indicated he opposes Planned Parenthood funding but has always stopped short of committing to sign legislation to stop the flow of taxpayer funds to the nation’s biggest abortion business.
“In a new interview with David Brody of CBN, Trump made that promise. Although his promise will go a long way towards reassuring pro-life voters he would implement specific pro-life policy on abortion as president, Trump continued to praise Planned Parenthood — following up on his “good things” and “wonderful work” comments that have turned off some pro-life voters.”[19]
GUN RIGHTS
How about the 2nd Amendment? Does Trump support the absolute right of anyone except convicted felons having the right to own a gun? Hitler and his henchmen didn’t think so:
Heinrich Himmler, head of Nazi S.S. ("Schutzstaffel"-Protection Squadron), stated:
"Germans who wish to use firearms should join the S.S. or the S.A. Ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State."
Disarming the civilian population was a necessary step in state control, as Vladimir Lenin explained: "One man with a gun can control 100 without one. "[20]
But what does Donald believe? He apparently believes the government has the right to ignore the 2nd Amendment and can ban so-called “assault weapons” which is nothing but Communist “Newspeak” for any gun that can fire multiple times before reloading.
“For assault weapon ban, waiting period, & background check
“I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on
assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a
gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours
if a potential gun owner has a record.
“Source: The America We
Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Jul 2, 2000”
Under the rule of Adolph Hitler it was decreed;
'Persons who, according to the
Nuremberg law, are regarded as Jews, are forbidden to possess any weapon.
Violators will be condemned to a concentration camp and imprisoned for a period
of up to 20 years.'"[21]
We have to ask the question, if
“assault weapons” should be banned according to the above quote by Trump, can
that ban be logically expanded to include other perceived firearm threats that
arise in the future? How about guns with extra-ordinary range, or power or
caliber? If the 2nd Amendment can be partially breached what is to
prevent further restriction?
HOMOSEXUAL (Sodomite) MARRIAGE
The frontrunner for the
Republican presidential nomination today promised "forward motion" on
gay and lesbian equality if he is elected.
“In an interview with NECN's Sue O'Connell just days
before the crucial New Hampshire primary, Trump cast himself as a uniter on
LGBT issues.
“O'Connell, who is also Bay
Windows' Publisher, identified herself as a lesbian in a question that noted
the progress the LGBT community has made in the last two decades and asked
Trump if voters can expect him to continue that momentum if elected
"When President Trump is in
office can we look for more forward motion on equality for gays and
lesbians?" O'Connell asked him.
"Well, you can," Trump
answered. " And look, again, we're going to bring people together, and
thats your thing and other people have their thing. We have to bring all people
together and if we don't we're not going to have a country anymore."[22]
What was Hitler’s stance on
Homosexuality?
“(Scott) Lively's crime? In his
book, "The Pink Swastika," Lively exposes a secret homosexual
activists don't want you to know about Nazi Germany: that although the Nazis
did persecute homosexuals, the homosexuals the Nazis persecuted were almost
exclusively the effeminate members of the gay community in Germany, and that
much of the mistreatment was administered by masculine homosexuals who despised
effeminacy in all its forms.
”Ludwig Lenz worked at the Sex Research Institute in Berlin, which was destroyed by Hitler's Brown Shirts in 1933 likely because its records, including 40,000 confessions from members of the Nazi Party, would have exposed the sexual perversions of Nazi leadership. Lenz said that "not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal."[23]
”Ludwig Lenz worked at the Sex Research Institute in Berlin, which was destroyed by Hitler's Brown Shirts in 1933 likely because its records, including 40,000 confessions from members of the Nazi Party, would have exposed the sexual perversions of Nazi leadership. Lenz said that "not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal."[23]
Is it possible we don’t have all
the facts regarding Trump’s views on homosexuals or is this article painting
with too wide of a brush? Or could the above research simply be the tip of an
iceberg which indicates a much deeper problem which most simply don’t suspect?
EMINENT DOMAIN
There is implied consent in the 5th
Amendment of our Constitution for eminent domain, saying private property
should not be taken by the government without “just compensation” but the
question is far from settled with scholars on both sides of the question
arguing strongly for their point of view, especially when private interests
have used it to condemn private property so that commercial development can
take place.
Likewise, the general public is
also divided on the issue, with conservatives and libertarians usually coming
down on the side of the individual and against the powers of the state
especially the power is used by private interests, and even notable resistance
when the state uses the power. Donald Trump is unequivocal in his view:
“Republican
presidential candidate Donald Trump argued that eminent domain, including for
private projects that “employ thousands of people” is “a wonderful thing” in an
interview broadcast on Tuesday’s “Special Report” on the Fox News Channel.
“Trump stated, “I think eminent
domain is wonderful, if you’re building a highway, and you need to build, as an
example, a highway, and you’re going to be blocked by a hold-out, or, in some
cases, it’s a hold-out, just so you understand, nobody knows this better than I
do, because I built a lot of buildings in Manhattan, and you’ll have 12 sites
and you’ll get 11 and you’ll have the one hold-out and you end up building
around them and everything else, okay? So, I know it better than anybody. I
think eminent domain for massive projects, for instance, you’re going to create
thousands of jobs, and you have somebody that’s in the way, and you pay that
person far more — don’t forget, eminent domain, they get a lot of money, and
you need a house in a certain location, because you’re going to build this
massive development that’s going to employ thousands of people, or you’re going
to build a factory, that without this little house, you can’t build the
factory. I think eminent domain is fine.”[24]
IS DONALD TRUMP A CHRISTIAN?
According to William J. Federer in his book “Three Secular Reasons why
America Should be under God”
“Though early in his career
Hitler pretended to be a Christian in order to get elected, once in power he
revealed his nazified social Darwinism and became openly hostile toward
Christianity.”[25]
This writer must ask the
question regarding the depth of Trump’s faith. Yes, we know he shredded the
Pope with just a few words over the “Mexican wall,” and we applauded him for it
because of the obvious danger we face with unrestricted borders, but we have
also noticed several occasions when we too wondered whether or not he is really
a Christian. Writing in The Christian Post, Rod Anderson comments:
“Donald
Trump said he's not sure if he's asked God for forgiveness, at the Family
Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, on Saturday, which led some to question the
sincerity of his alleged Christian faith.“Moderator Frank Luntz asked Trump on Saturday if he had ever sought God's forgiveness and Trump replied, "I'm not sure I have ever asked God's forgiveness. I don't bring God into that picture."
Trump clarified further about forgiveness in the church setting saying, "When I go to church and when I drink my little wine and have my little cracker, I guess that is a form of forgiveness. I do that as often as I can because I feel cleansed. I say let's go on and let's make it right," declared Trump.”[26]
It’s a little hard to imagine someone being a Christian without “bringing God into the picture or being forgiven by a little cracker.” On the other hand it’s not hard to imagine someone professing to be a Christian in order to gain support from those that really are. Let’s just say there seems to be room for skepticism.
When you write an article like this questioning the pronouncements and veracity of a major figure in today’s world of wide-spread corruption, you run the risk of almost being “un-American,” but so be it. My worst dream is to place a “strong man” in a place with life or death power over our future. We have seen enough of that over the 8 years of Barack Obama. We don’t need anymore. There are parallels between Donald Trump and Adolph Hitler that should keep us awake at night and caution us to move very, very carefully in blindly following a man who seems to be able to capture to world and to easily shrug off words that would sink anyone else. The exception however is one who is secure in his relationship with the Lord of Glory and his eventual transition into living forever in heaven with Jesus.
Is it possible that Trump indeed, is being guided by a “higher power” but not necessarily the One that wrote the Bible?
Dietrich Bonhoeffer warned
Germans not to slip into the cult of Führer (leader) worship,
as he could turn out to be a Verführer (mis-leader, seducer).
There is a lesson we all need to learn. When a
writing such as this is ignored or attacked we are dangerously close to the
present assault on the 1st Amendment granting us freedom of speech.
I am reminded of what Martin Niemöller
said following the reign of Adolph Hitler,
"First
they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out because I was
not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me-and there was no one left to speak for me."
[1] Guardians of
the Grail, Copyright 1989, Prophecy Publications, Oklahoma City, OK
[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar
[6] Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ article-3210778/Donald-Trump-Hillary-Clinton-revealed-distant-cousins-family-trees-share-set-royal-ancestors.html#ixzz3k2MAEHXo
[7]
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-davos-meeting-trump-elite-idUSKCN0UZ2MD
[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings
[9]
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/08/16/why-hillary-clinton-needs-donald-trump-to-stay-out-of-prison/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-hillary-clinton-needs-donald-trump-to-stay-out-of-prison
[10]
https://faculty.history.wisc.edu/sommerville/367/367-04.htm
[11]
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
[12]
http://www.sott.net/article/298259-The-Americans-who-funded-Hitler-Nazis-German-economic-miracle-and-World-War-II
[13]
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Wall_Street_Rise_Hitler.html
[14]
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs155/1108762609255/archive/1123700933555.html
[15] Ibid
[16] http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/20/us/politics/donald-trump-in-triage-mode-after-shocking-conservatives-with-health-care-comments.html?_r=0
16
Ibid
[18]
https://www.lifesitenews.com/pulse/donald-trump-noticeably-absent-from-gop-candidates-standing-for-life-on-ann
[19]
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/21/donald-trump-defends-planned-parenthood-abortion-biz-my-friends-know-it-better-than-you/
[20]
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs155/1108762609255/archive/1123700933555.html
[21] Ibid
[22]
http://www.pridesource.com/article.html?article=75190
[23]
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/080515
[25] I
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/080515
[26]
http://www.christianpost.com/news/donald-trumps-nonchalant-christianity-141834/
